<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeremy Visser &#187; open source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremy.visser.name/tag/open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jeremy.visser.name</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://jeremy.visser.name/?pushpress=hub'/>
<cloud domain='jeremy.visser.name' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>WP 2.8 Design Challenge: to free or not to free?</title>
		<link>https://jeremy.visser.name/2009/04/26/to-free-or-not-to-free/</link>
		<comments>https://jeremy.visser.name/2009/04/26/to-free-or-not-to-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aargh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.visser.name/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read that WordPress is holding a design challenge for a brush-up of the current administration administration interface for the upcoming version 2.8. Here&#8217;s an mockup of what they&#8217;re looking for in a new design: I am very happy with the WordPress 2.7 interface, and I am even happier that it is going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read that WordPress is holding a <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/265261">design</a> <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/guidelines-for-2-8-navigation-design/">challenge</a> for a brush-up of the current administration administration interface for the upcoming version 2.8. Here&#8217;s an mockup of what they&#8217;re looking for in a new design:</p>
<p><img src="http://wpdotorg.wordpress.com/files/2009/04/mt-dash1.png" alt="Matt T's mockup" /></p>
<p>I am very happy with the WordPress 2.7 interface, and I am even happier that it is going to be polished and made even better with 2.8.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, entrants to the challenge must be based on the <a href="http://s.wordpress.org/graphics/mt-db.psd">.psd file</a> by Matt Thomas, which <a href="http://wordpress.org/development/guidelines-for-2-8-navigation-design/">in their own words</a> is because:</p>
<blockquote><p>We’re providing Matt’s .psd file for you to work from. Please do not create your own file and submit that, since if your design is chosen but your file isn’t in the right format, we won’t have time to let you fix it. Just edit over the layers.</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem? .psd is the <strong>proprietary format</strong> of Adobe Photoshop, which is a <em>proprietary</em> program that costs <em>hundreds of dollars</em> that also only runs on other <em>proprietary</em> operating systems.</p>
<p>So because I choose to use <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> for my <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux">day</a>-<a href="http://www.inkscape.org/">to</a>-<a href="http://www.gimp.org/">day</a> <a href="http://www.php.net/">tasks</a> which is morally better and technically superior (SVG is much better for such mockups), I and hundreds of other WordPress contributors would be unable to submit my designs for the competition because of the simple fact that they choose to be locked into a proprietary format.</p>
<p>Photoshop may be the most widely used mockup program among web designers out there. <strong>So what?</strong> It requires you to step into a world of proprietary non-free software that has ideals directly contrary to that which enabled WordPress to flourish in the first place, and expend hundreds of dollars that is simply unnecessary.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean anything personal to anybody &#8212; at Automattic or Adobe &#8212; I just thought the folks at Automattic were into <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=open+source&#038;sitesearch=ma.tt">this whole open source thing</a>.</p>
<p>Do not alienate the community that gives you your very existence.</p>
<p>The solution? Don&#8217;t just accept open formats created by free software; actively encourage their use &#8212; hire someone who <a href="http://klepas.org/">knows how</a> to <a href="http://www.fitzsimon.com.au/Andy/">use them</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jeremy.visser.name/2009/04/26/to-free-or-not-to-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Source definition</title>
		<link>https://jeremy.visser.name/2008/01/17/open-source-definition/</link>
		<comments>https://jeremy.visser.name/2008/01/17/open-source-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremy.visser.name/2008/01/open-source-definition</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew, A source release is source code that someone else can build, right out of the tarball. THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the technical definition of Open Source. What about Python or PHP applications that don&#8217;t need building? I think you need to add a non-binary exception to your above definition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://research.operationaldynamics.com/blogs/andrew/software/freedom/reusing-experience.html">Andrew</a>,</p>
<blockquote cite="http://research.operationaldynamics.com/blogs/andrew/software/freedom/reusing-experience.html"><p>A source release is source code that someone else can build, right out of the tarball. THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the technical definition of Open Source.</p></blockquote>
<p>What about Python or PHP applications that don&#8217;t need building? I think you need to add a non-binary exception to your above definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://jeremy.visser.name/2008/01/17/open-source-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
